“This vote,” Hammonds said, “advances a voluntary labeling solution to one of the costliest and most convoluted labeling laws ever enacted. Mandatory labeling will cost consumers billions of dollars, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. It could disrupt trade with nations such as Canada and Mexico that view such labeling as protectionist trade barriers.
“By contrast, voluntary labeling:
- “Builds on existing state, regional and U.S. brand labeling programs that clearly benefit consumers, producers and retailers.
- “Provides the flexibility to use a variety of labeling solutions, such as the stickers, packages and twist-ties already on over 75 percent of all produce items.
- “Allows labeling to be performed in the supply chain where it is most cost effective to do so.
- “Can be implemented sooner than the September 2006 deadline for mandatory labeling of meat and produce.”
"Country of origin and U.S. brand labeling are emerging trends independent of any legislation,” Hammonds said. “Retailers frequently feature ethnic foods and the fruits, vegetables and meat of local producers. A voluntary labeling law will speed up this natural course without fueling food inflation.”